| Autor: Krzysztof Lament | 335 |
Strony: 335-348
pełen tekst
INTERNAL CONTROL OF ORDER OF PUBLIC PROJECT REALIZED CENTER OF EUROPEAN UNION
Summary
The public contracts system is one of the main important issue of economic policy of each modern state. Scale of involved public means systematically grows – egz. in 2008 in Poland the level was over 100 billion PLN. Thanks to membership in EU, since 2004, Poland has benefi t from different fi nancial programs for growing and developing. However this support is strictly regulated by different regulations – agis communotaire. The Treaty establishing the European Community set the four main princilpes: the principle of freedom of movement of goods, the principle of freedom of establishment the principle of freedom to provide services and the principles deriving therefrom, such as the principle of equal treatment, the principle of non-discrimination, the principle of mutual recognition, the principle of proportionality and the principle of transparency. As a member of EU, Poland has to obey all the regulations. Our country has to prepare and introduce the most effective mechanism of control to ensure that the EU-found are spend in the most effective and transparent way. The transgressing of common regulations may cause loss of admitted founds. That’s why the public contract system has the key meaning as far as utilization of co-founds are concerned. Correct employment the regulations of pulic contracts is one of the crucial element in the process of realization of the co-fi nanced operations. This study incluses report about the system of the control established for Polish public contract system as well as it shows the responsibility for transgressing these regulations. This study presents also a few the most typical examples of mistakes or transgressing of the regulations of the public contract system. The controls carried by regional and national services reveal lots of act of mistakes and act of breaking the regulations. Some of them don’t have meanings for correctness of procedure however others may even cause invalidation of agreement and the return of the grant as a repercussion.
pełen tekstINTERNAL CONTROL OF ORDER OF PUBLIC PROJECT REALIZED CENTER OF EUROPEAN UNION
Summary
The public contracts system is one of the main important issue of economic policy of each modern state. Scale of involved public means systematically grows – egz. in 2008 in Poland the level was over 100 billion PLN. Thanks to membership in EU, since 2004, Poland has benefi t from different fi nancial programs for growing and developing. However this support is strictly regulated by different regulations – agis communotaire. The Treaty establishing the European Community set the four main princilpes: the principle of freedom of movement of goods, the principle of freedom of establishment the principle of freedom to provide services and the principles deriving therefrom, such as the principle of equal treatment, the principle of non-discrimination, the principle of mutual recognition, the principle of proportionality and the principle of transparency. As a member of EU, Poland has to obey all the regulations. Our country has to prepare and introduce the most effective mechanism of control to ensure that the EU-found are spend in the most effective and transparent way. The transgressing of common regulations may cause loss of admitted founds. That’s why the public contract system has the key meaning as far as utilization of co-founds are concerned. Correct employment the regulations of pulic contracts is one of the crucial element in the process of realization of the co-fi nanced operations. This study incluses report about the system of the control established for Polish public contract system as well as it shows the responsibility for transgressing these regulations. This study presents also a few the most typical examples of mistakes or transgressing of the regulations of the public contract system. The controls carried by regional and national services reveal lots of act of mistakes and act of breaking the regulations. Some of them don’t have meanings for correctness of procedure however others may even cause invalidation of agreement and the return of the grant as a repercussion.